Discussion about this post

User's avatar
HarrietteTheSpy's avatar

Thanks for this excellent concise synopsis!

Expand full comment
Lawrence Mazzuckelli's avatar

Well done. As I am also loath to call this stuff a "vaccine" and since CDC had to change the definition of what a vaccine is in order to accommodate how this stuff functions, I prefer to call it an "inoculant" or if I'm really making a point "concoction" since there are questions about its composition.

I have also noted a dose response based on the vastly under reported VAERS data here

( https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/the-first-48-hours-and-and-things ) and here

( https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/for-every-dose-there-is-a-response ) and here

( https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/myocarditis-no-matter-how-hard-cdc ).

VAERS has been variously reported to be under reported by a factor ranging from 20 (Steve Kirsch) to 100 ( Robert Lazarus). The UK is now reporting inoculant related myo/pericarditis mortality within days of being jabbed, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970 .

Even CDC has accepted the fact that there is an association between the inoculant and myo/pericarditis though they attempted to mask the dose response by their data presentation which I addressed here: https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/myocarditis-no-matter-how-hard-cdc

Until we trust that God will protect us in our quest and pronouncement of the truth CDC and FDA and others will continue to deceive the world.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts