8 Comments

Thanks for this excellent concise synopsis!

Expand full comment

Well done. As I am also loath to call this stuff a "vaccine" and since CDC had to change the definition of what a vaccine is in order to accommodate how this stuff functions, I prefer to call it an "inoculant" or if I'm really making a point "concoction" since there are questions about its composition.

I have also noted a dose response based on the vastly under reported VAERS data here

( https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/the-first-48-hours-and-and-things ) and here

( https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/for-every-dose-there-is-a-response ) and here

( https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/myocarditis-no-matter-how-hard-cdc ).

VAERS has been variously reported to be under reported by a factor ranging from 20 (Steve Kirsch) to 100 ( Robert Lazarus). The UK is now reporting inoculant related myo/pericarditis mortality within days of being jabbed, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059970 .

Even CDC has accepted the fact that there is an association between the inoculant and myo/pericarditis though they attempted to mask the dose response by their data presentation which I addressed here: https://lawrencemazzuckelli.substack.com/p/myocarditis-no-matter-how-hard-cdc

Until we trust that God will protect us in our quest and pronouncement of the truth CDC and FDA and others will continue to deceive the world.

Expand full comment

Thanks to both of you for this very simple, clear, concise summary!

Expand full comment

This was a fabulous presentation thank you so much 🙂

I appreciate the referencing of studies to validate each point.

I’ve learnt so much.

If the jabs were a sterilising vaccination like the measles vaccination, then we would be right to look at the relative risk of myocarditis from the virus vs the vaccine itself.

With a jab, that (through the production of spike protein) appears to be a poison with dubious therapeutic side effects, it may provide a double risk factor - risk of myocarditis from the jab, and then risk from the viral infection that the ‘vaccination’ is so feeble in preventing…

There is also the worrying possibility of an additive effect on heart damage.

Are there are any studies that have shown the jab reduces the risk of myocarditis in people that then become infected with any strain of covid-19??

Expand full comment

Thank you and God bless both you and your husband. Your patients are so fortunate to have honest, godly doctors! I know it must be heartbreaking to see what you see.

Expand full comment

Thank you!

I will virate it.

Expand full comment

Good word!

Expand full comment

My invention! :)

Expand full comment